don't think the CA$ deliberately maliciously litigate against families? think again 

[11] The Applicant described other instances of what he described as hostile and biased treatment by Society workers against him.
These included a statement "need to go full force" with the Applicant in a case note dated October [ ], 2010 made by the CPW and for the purpose of documenting her consultation with one of her supervisors.

Full documentation found here @CanLII: Click here

...need to go full force" against this dad.

wanna bet Muskoka CA$ ex. dir. Mary Rutledge was directly involved in this case?

this case is now a 3 million dollar lawsuit filed against the Muskoka CA$ in the Superior court in St. Catherines ON. we need someone to go and obtain a copy of the Statement of Claim and CA$'s response. we'll cover the costs. any takers?


Source: FAMILY, YOUTH AND CHILD SERVICES OF MUSKOKA

REASONS FOR DECISION Date: September 6, 2012

File Number: CA11-0041 Citation: 2012 CFSRB 35

Indexed as: D.H. v. Family, Youth and Child Services of Muskoka (CFSA s.68)


INTRODUCTION

[1] D.H. (the “Applicant”) filed an application on March 28, 2011 with the Child and Family Services Review Board (the “Board”). He was complaining about the Family, Youth and Child Services of Muskoka (the “Society”) pursuant to sections 68.1 (4) 4 and 5 of the Child and Family Services Act (the “Act”).

[2] The issues raised in this application and heard at the hearing are that the Society failed to comply with subsections 68.1(4) 4 and 5 namely:

• The Society did not hear the Applicant’s service concerns or hear him when decisions were made and the Society did not provide him with reasons for decisions that affected his interests, regarding his complaint regarding parental alienation syndrome, gender bias and the relationship between the Society and his ex-wife.


[3] The Board conducted a Hearing on December 14, 2011 and August 15, 2012. The Board finds in favour of the Applicant.