Truth is in a man's actions, not in someone else's blind accusations.

Click for the video
December 05 2021

Father Rights Canada / I am a father fighting for my kids
Not disclosed audience: Public
I need help I have been threw every lawyer in the district I feel like they this is a g...
List of Family Court Officials who take children away from loving, protective parents
Papa Inbc audience: Public
Damon's List is a List of Family Court Judges, Lawyers, Psychologists, and Other Offici...
July 01 2013 rural northern Ontario Canada - phone call with another world
audience: Authenticated Login and access July 01 2013 rural northern Ontario Canada - phone call with another world
Canada's day with my daughter over a Ontario Canada Court of Justice Order,  phone...
Father Rights Canada / Father being denied access in Manitoba
audience: Public
Depends on if they have a current order in place and what that order states for access<...
Re: Good family lawyers Grimsby/Hamilton Ontario area?
Carey Mc audience: Public
there is no such thing as a good family lawyer, they are all corrupt, self represent an...

Authors & content contributions
Member Login
Page Grid

FOLLOW Brainsyntax VIA EMAIL Enter your email address and receive notifications of selective new pages by email.

Join 12050 other brainsyntax email notification followers

Searching for my children

Fathers in distress if you ever need to talk, or just vent, please message us Contact: Fathers Rights Canada
Deadly Epidemic Against Dads


To my children & To those that may be concerned ...
Re: Re: Re: Radio interview with Sandra Giesbrecht - Rational vs Irrational Things dont Add up!

audience: Public

Anna Marie is it?&nbsp; &nbsp;I'm putting this out there I have no affiliation ...
VIORICA LUNGU - My EX has stollen my identity in order to slander me!

audience: Public

Without Prejudice, the truth stands firm! My ex has stolen my identity, using my name in ...
Father Rights Canada / baby mom won't let me see her for no good reason
Curtis Small
audience: Public

Until the laws are changed here in The great white north, smile and wave, just smile an...
Father Rights Canada / The kids mother has been out of the picture since 2016
Not disclosed
audience: Public

I need help. After years of dealing with the courts and MEP I finally got custody in Ju...
Right to be a parent maliciously prevented with the help of hired racketeering rings Family Law Barristers & Solicitors
Josip Gorscak
audience: Public

This story made me cry ... "Charlie" ... I know your pain ! "I hear ya- I feel ya" ! .....

audience: Authenticated Login and access PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME  Julie R. Ancis, Ph.D.

Canada Family Law Court where Citizens are Abused and Ridiculed
Frank Andrecyk Stead Law Group
audience: Authenticated Login and access Canada Family Law Court where Citizens are Abused and Ridiculed

I know a father that was vilified by his ex. The police, Children's Aid and the Family ...
Waterloo Regional Pig Service is one of the most cowardly CA$ ass licking Pig Services in Canada
Ed. Kellestine
audience: Public

&nbsp; what a bunch of f#king a%holes my god give the guy a...
Corrupt cops and Racisism in the City of Peterborough Ontario
audience: Public

All THREE&nbsp; victim complaints on OPP site are a result of PETERBOROUGH's mistreatme...
Re: Family Law in Alberta is a mess - many more generations are destroyed
Ralph Keagan
audience: Public

It's not just Alberta. Its the whole country.

★★★ Join brainsyntax

Log On as Member


The best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience

Sunday, June 7, 2015 - AbusesToChildren - Glenn Cheriton

I write to you as a concerned parent about actions of the Federal Department of Justice (DOJ) which I believe are undermining a Supreme Court judgment, disadvantaging numerous children and insidiously damaging relationships between parents and children against the will of Parliament.

I specifically refer to the following page on the Government of Canada website:


This is a commentary on the Gordon v. Goertz Supreme Court ruling regarding custody and moveaways. The Justice Department has decided to turn that rather clear ruling on its head, by citing the losing opinion as if it were the law. L'Heureux-Dubé, writing for the minority, opined that the custodial parent has sole authority to decide the best interest of the child, and the noncustodial parent has to prove that a move would not be in the child's best interest.

By law, that interpretation lost and was rejected by the majority of the Court.

The Justice Department gives about 600 words to the minority, and about 50 words to the majority ruling. How will most ordinary citizens understand this? How will lower court judges? Lawyers? Has DOJ promoted this misleading, inaccurate, and unacceptable view to judges through judicial training?

Parents have complained to me that judges have cited the minority opinion, as the DOJ does above, in reasons for ruling against their continued parenting in moveaway cases.

The Supreme Court ruling puts the best interests of the child ahead of the moveaway parent “rights”. Social science is clear that both parents parenting produces the best outcomes for children.

DoJ spreads this disinformation and causes disadvantage and suffering for children and parents.

Even the Canadian Bar Association agrees that the best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience, “rights” and wishes of one parent.

The DOJ also interprets that “custody” is not a controversial concept, directly contrary to the clear recommendations and position of the 1998 Joint Senate Commons committee on child custody, which recommended replacing the term. I interpret the actions of the DOJ as a direct contradiction of Parliament. Do you feel that unelected bureaucrats should be contradicting the clearly expressed will of Parliamentarians and undermining the Supreme Court and due process of law?

I ask you, if you agree, to write to the Minister of Justice and respectfully request that he order his department to rewrite this page to reflect the decision of the Supreme Court and remove the opinion of the minority, which failed.
The millions of middle class parents, who do not have the money to refight the arbitrary decisions of those who are undermining the Supreme Court, will thank you. I thank you for your attention to this important issue.

Mr. Glenn Cheriton
Ottawa, ON 

last update
Sunday, June 7, 2015
legal disclaimer
Add new
Share this Page
Generate PDF file
Generate document The best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience
Download PDF
Member access & Options
Search Google about
Search bing.com about
Content feed
RSS content feed: The best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience
Notified by email email notification on replies to this page: The best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience click here and receive notification of this specific page
Add your Comment Reply add your comments to: The best interests of the child should take precedence over the convenience Reply to in a new window
Create a new page
0 replies
Access Brainsyntax

★★★ ★★★ Become a brainsyntax Member ★★★ ★★★

Access non public pages as Member
Introduce or record new content We are also assisting with content placement, subjects: Family Courts, Family Law Cases, Parental Alienation, Lawyers & Judges, Obstructions of Justice, Police, Courts, spiteful ex's, Hostile aggressive parenting, injustice, malice, obstruction, oppression and many other subjects ... Contact us

★★★ ★★★ Brainsyntax Members, Add new content, build the brainsyntax.com application ★★★ ★★★
Back || Home
Latest pages on brainsyntax.com: