Truth is in a man's actions, not in someone else's blind accusations.

Click for the video
June 19 2021

Re I will make sure I point a gun to my self and she won't receive a penny
Richard Roam audience: Public
I have never contemplated suicide for 2 reasons. One i always thought it was the chicke...
Re: Financial gag unless my son comes up with over $100,000 to bring a motion to the courts
Aubrey Dunn audience: Public
Welcome to the war on men and fathers, specifically.
Re: Re Angry Sudbury father flips out on children - Splinter of CCW - sabotaged and misguided souls
Chris York audience: Public
Pat and I were both booted from there this morning and started our own group now with the ...
Re: The courts are corrupted and their is a bias by the courts that they accept
Edward Konowicz audience: Public
Family courts are still engaged in horrendous crimes against families. But they are being ...
Re: Dont wanna give up but feel like there nothing I can do
Tanis Kucher audience: Public
That is hardly supportive or productive. Rolling over and being a "victim" is never going ...

Authors & content contributions
Member Login
Page Grid

FOLLOW Brainsyntax VIA EMAIL Enter your email address and receive notifications of selective new pages by email.

Join 12050 other brainsyntax email notification followers

Searching for my children

Fathers in distress if you ever need to talk, or just vent, please message us Contact: Fathers Rights Canada
Deadly Epidemic Against Dads


To my children & To those that may be concerned ...
Advocacy Canada
Re: Re: Father Rights Canada / Websites like this just fuel the fires
Tori Anderson
audience: Public

Amy Elisabet Lind when did I ever say that mothers should have more rights? I agree bot...
Re: Wife has taken our children and demands a court order before I see them again
People Against Deadbeat Mothers
audience: Public

Study Family Law, Self Representation is your best option, and file for Shared 50/50 cu...
That's what they think about my kids...randy and crew
Rudy Orr Kenneth Skeeter Boxberger
audience: Public

This is from one of the owners of future of our children radio network...its a Chicago ...
Re: Class-action suit launched on behalf of Crown wards - Current or former Crown wards Printable Intake form

audience: Public

Video footage Paola Loriggio, The Canadian Press Published Monday, March 24, 2014 3:14PM...
Dr Kathleen M Reay talks about signs of Parental Alienation

audience: Public

Dr. Kathleen M. Reay http://...
Re: Re: New Law Lets Government Take Children Away If Parents Dont Accept Their Gender Identity
Brian Alexander
audience: Public

Faith Mills you like to blame religious groups but there are many queer kids from atheists...
Re: Sault Ste Marie Police beat suicidal man into coma
Concerned Citizen of Sault Ste Marie
audience: Public

Hello the SIU* The province’s Special Investigations Unit (SIU) is saying the onl...
Re: Courts need to be asking more specific questions before placing a EPO
Lecyn Williams
audience: Public

re: To understand what this email is all about, please explain EPO. EPO is ...
Financial Strategies for Divorcing A Narcissist
Jeff Landers
audience: Public

In recent years, the word “narcissist” has crept into the popular vernacula...
Re: Father Rights Canada / Class action lawsuit against the government of Canada
audience: Authenticated Login and access Re: Father Rights Canada / Class action lawsuit against the government of Canada

am a father in Toronto would like to join class action law suit contact me at freddy_b1...

★★★ Join brainsyntax

Log On as Member


Albert Fraser calls hair testing developing science warns against it in child protection cases

Tuesday, March 8, 2016 - Information - Karissa Donkin - Bob Murphy

A retired forensic toxicologist is calling on Nova Scotia to stop using hair-based drug and alcohol testing, arguing it is a "developing science" that shouldn't be used in child protection cases until more is known.

"It's an emerging discipline," said Albert Fraser, who worked at the Victoria General Hospital in Halifax for 25 years. "But it's not a mature scientific discipline."

Albert Fraser
Retired forensic toxicologist Albert Fraser says hair-based drug and alcohol testing is a 'developing science.' (Submitted by Albert Fraser)

Ontario and New Brunswick have both ordered child protection agencies to stop using hair testing after serious shortcomings were found at the Motherisk lab at The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto.

Motherisk also conducted tests on as many as 2,300 people in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, a CBC News investigation has revealed.

Between 1997 and 2005, hundreds of those people produced at least one positive test result indicating the use of drugs or alcohol. The hospital now admits those results may be "inaccurate or unreliable."

After discovering problems at Motherisk, the Ontario government told all social services agencies in the province to stop using hair-strand drug testing "out of an abundance of caution" last April.

A reversal in New Brunswick

New Brunswick followed suit and stopped using the tests, citing concerns about the "overall reliability" of hair testing.

Until then, the province was still ordering hair tests from Dynacare, an Ontario-based lab that says its testing is "robust" and provides "high-quality analytical toxicology service for analysis of drugs-of-abuse in hair."

Meanwhile, Nova Scotia continues to conduct hair testing. Andrea Price, a spokeswoman with Dynacare, confirmed the lab is still performing tests for Nova Scotia. She declined to comment on hair testing moratoriums in other provinces.

Motherisk scandal highlights risk of deferring to experts without questioning credentials

Hundreds of Ontario adoptions on hold amid Motherisk drug-test scandal

However, in a statement to CBC News Monday, Heather Fairbairn, a spokeswoman with Nova Scotia's Department of Community Services signaled there could be a change coming.

"Now that the science behind hair strand testing itself is coming into question, the department is considering the value it may offer to our clients and will be looking at alternative options," Fairbairn said.

"Hair strand analysis was just one among a number of tools the department may employ in child protection cases. However, these results alone would not be the single determining factor in the outcome a case."

Not meeting forensic standards

A review into Motherisk's practices found the lab didn't meet international forensic standards and its leaders had no formal training or experience in forensic toxicology. The lab shut down its hair-testing operations for good last year.

According to Fraser, a forensic lab requires high security because samples may be used in court. Each step of the testing is carefully documented so there's less chance of contamination.

"Almost anything you would think of as being a requirement for forensic identification for a drug in a biological fluid, they didn't follow forensic conventions at all, which is most unfortunate," Fraser said. "It's a tragedy."

But the forensic toxicologist's concerns with hair-based drug testing go beyond Motherisk.

He questions whether the science should be used at all in child protection cases.

'A lot of unanswered questions'

Part of his concern comes from the "colour bias" involved in hair testing.

Because of the different pigments found in hair, Fraser said someone with darker hair may absorb drugs in much higher concentrations than someone with grey or blonde hair.

"It's problematic if one wants to relate the amount of drug that is present to the extent of drug abuse by the individual who had that hair that was being tested," Fraser said.

The concerns are different than with blood or urine testing, which Fraser said has been used "a thousand-fold" more often than hair testing.

He said Nova Scotia should stop all hair testing until it learns more about the science.

"It isn't that hair testing won't have a role," he said. "But you can't go to something that's developing and make that your absolute, because there are still a lot of unanswered questions about the technology."

Still being used in courts

The debate around hair testing is also being waged inside courtrooms.

As recently as February, a judge in Sydney was faced with conflicting drug test results from three different labs, including Motherisk.

Justice Lee Anne MacLeod-Archer set aside all drug testing evidence.

She returned the children to the care of their mother, who insisted she hadn't used drugs in months.

"The evidence is insufficient to prove reliability of those reports for purposes of this proceeding," MacLeod-Archer wrote in her ruling.



In reply of
last update
Tuesday, March 8, 2016
legal disclaimer
Add new
Share this Page
Generate PDF file
Generate document Albert Fraser calls hair testing developing science warns against it in child protection cases
Download PDF
Search Google about
Search bing.com about
Content feed
RSS content feed: Albert Fraser calls hair testing developing science warns against it in child protection cases
Notified by email email notification on replies to this page: Albert Fraser calls hair testing developing science warns against it in child protection cases click here and receive notification of this specific page
Add your Comment Reply add your comments to: Albert Fraser calls hair testing developing science warns against it in child protection cases Reply to in a new window
Create a new page
0 replies
Access Brainsyntax

★★★ ★★★ Become a brainsyntax Member ★★★ ★★★

Access non public pages as Member
Introduce or record new content We are also assisting with content placement, subjects: Family Courts, Family Law Cases, Parental Alienation, Lawyers & Judges, Obstructions of Justice, Police, Courts, spiteful ex's, Hostile aggressive parenting, injustice, malice, obstruction, oppression and many other subjects ... Contact us

★★★ ★★★ Brainsyntax Members, Add new content, build the brainsyntax.com application ★★★ ★★★
Back || Home
Latest pages on brainsyntax.com: