X

Truth is in a man's actions, not in someone else's blind accusations.

Click for the video
X
August 13 2020

Re: Father Rights Canada / Mom trys to get rid of baby
Nick Chouinard audience: Public
Adopt your child if she wants to give it up adopt it you get first dibs if she wants to...
Acumentrics Canada
KnowYourRights audience: Authenticated Login and access Acumentrics Canada
I am a social/ justice worker(not affiliated with ANY government organ...
Re: Canada Capital of Child Parent Alienation sponsored by your society and their Family Law Act
Kyle Langford audience: Public
Today is the day I stand infront of a judge and ask him to make my ex and her lawyer to...
The sign which this father of eight is holding has been around the block once or twice
Chris Carter audience: Authenticated Login and access The sign which this father of eight is holding has been around the block once or twice
this is one dad and family who benefited greatly ...
Canada Family Law Court where Citizens are Abused and Ridiculed
Frank Andrecyk Stead Law Group audience: Public
I know a father that was vilified by his ex. The police, Children's Aid and the Family ...
Navigation

Authors & content contributions
Categories
Groups
Member Login
Page Grid

FOLLOW Brainsyntax VIA EMAIL Enter your email address and receive notifications of selective new pages by email.

Join 11080 other brainsyntax email notification followers

Searching for my children

Fathers in distress if you ever need to talk, or just vent, please message us Contact: Fathers Rights Canada
Deadly Epidemic Against Dads


Parents

To my children & To those that may be concerned ...
Advocacy Canada
Should a Mental Illness Mean You Lose Your Kid?
Cliff Roy
audience: Public

Statistics claim 1 in 5 will have a mental illness in their lifetime. There is no end t...
Father Rights Canada /Im in need of assistance to file complaints on both cps and a psychiatrist
Jered Gene Alex Sagodi
audience: Public

Im in need of assistance to file complaints on both cps and a psychiatrist who colluded...
Asking for my alienated Child's Voice April 05 2014
Vincent
audience: Authenticated Login and access Asking for my alienated Child's Voice April 05 2014

Phone recording April 05 2014 Saturday 745pm Phone call with Michaela and her father. C...
Children who are subject to the parental alienation syndrome JUDGED REASONS FOR DECISION
brainsyntax
audience: Authenticated Login and access Children who are subject to the parental alienation syndrome JUDGED REASONS FOR DECISION

Not ones this person wrote about this site positive or negative now I been told I will ...
My father Ken Thompson was killed by the family court
Vernon Beck Trena Thompson
audience: Public

Readers are urged to download the file and to send it off to your local MP and MPP and ...
Father Rights Canada / I need to speak to someone about my son
Gary Mitchell
audience: Authenticated Login and access Father Rights Canada / I need to speak to someone about my son

I need to speak to someone about my son who was in an accident and is now a paraplegic ...
Father Rights Canada -legal to remove a child without court order from a parent life?
Not disclosed
audience: Public

So i am unsure how to word this in legal terms so ill simply say what i am asking about...
Re: Dont wanna give up but feel like there nothing I can do
Nay Nay
audience: Public

Get a new lawyer he works for you .. you pay him
Ombud oversight of CAS needed to give vulnerable children voice
CHRISTINA BLIZZARD
audience: Public

In an interview this week, ombudsman Andre Marin, the province’s crusading watchd...
brainsyntax.com

★★★ Join brainsyntax

Log On as Member

X

You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel

Monday, May 19, 2014 - FamilyCourt - Jeremy Swanson - Fathers in action group

I have long wondered as to why all the family courts not only in Canada, but the UK, New Zealand and Australia, independently come to the same conclusion independently, that fathers are an unnecessary burden on a child after the mother deems it so? and as her word in any of the above country's is worth twice that of the father, as any father knows if he is in court he might as well recite nursery rhymes.

After being in court in three of the country's  mentioned in unfamily court, I have to say I personally believe there has been a conspiracy by the judiciary for this to occur,  that may be backed up by the statements of Justice Colridge, " Lord Thomas issued a warning say Sir Paul had brought the judiciary into disrepute with his views."  so old lord Tom is saying that justice Coleridge has to follow the general line of consensus that all the other judges have agreed upon?

This is also relative in Canada as there is a supreme court ruling by Chief Justice Dickson, see below, stating that judges are supposed to think independently, and not collectively as pedantic mooron's.

The courts website where this was taken from has long since been removed, again part of their conspiracy.

 

Chief justice Dickson

 http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/legal_compendium/Chapter6.asp <http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/legal_compendium/Chapter6.asp

 

Chief Justice Dickson of the Supreme Court of Canada gave a useful description of judicial independence in an important case.5 <http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/legal_compendium/Chapter6.htm#en05>  He wrote:

The role of the courts as resolver of disputes, interpreter of the law and defender of the Constitution requires that they be completely separate in authority and function from all other participants in the justice system. The principle of judicial independence has been the complete liberty of individual judges to hear and decide the cases that come before them; no outsider  be it government, pressure group, individual or even another judge  should interfere in fact, or attempt to interfere, with the way in which a judge conducts his or her case and makes his or her decision.

http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/1996/1996scc113.html <http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/1996/1996scc113.html>

  

I believe they conspired to have consensus amongst  the judiciaries of the above country's at this conference

 

BATH WORLD CONGRESS ON FAMILY LAW – SEPTEMBER 2001 NOTES ON THE CONFERENCE:

 

http://www.dottal.org/LBDUK/bath%202001.htm 

 

You should recognize many names

Here is an article  where a judge has been chastised and effectively fired for stating what I have explained above

 

High Court judge who spoke out in favour of marriage says he would have been 'publicly hanged' if he had spoken out again <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2632061/High-Court-judge-spoke-favour-marriage-says-publicly-hanged-spoken-again.html>

image <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2632061/High-Court-judge-spoke-favour-marriage-says-publicly-hanged-spoken-again.html>

High Court judge who spoke out in favour of marriage say... <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2632061/High-Court-judge-spoke-favour-marriage-says-publicly-hanged-spoken-again.html>

Sir Paul Coleridge, pictured, defended the right of judges to voice their private opinions on issues they believed were of national importance.

View on www.dailymail.co.uk <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2632061/High-Court-judge-spoke-favour-marriage-says-publicly-hanged-spoken-again.html>

 

A High Court judge who stepped down after being disciplined for campaigning in favour of marriage said he would have been ‘publicly hanged’ if he had spoken out again.

Sir Paul Coleridge launched a stinging attack against Lord Thomas, the country’s most senior judge, for rebuking him after he repeatedly spoke out about the harm that family breakdowns caused children.

 

He said the judiciary had been ‘brought into disrepute’ by investigating him for backing a traditional view of marriage.

Sir Paul, Britain’s top divorce judge, was given a formal warning by the Lord Chief Justice and Justice Secretary Chris Grayling for judicial misconduct, prompting him to hand in his resignation.

Yesterday he hit back to defend the right of judges to voice their private opinions on issues they believed were of national importance.

He said the way he had been treated proved the senior judiciary was ‘terrified of mild criticism’ and ‘trivial’ complaints by a few members of the public.

Sir Paul set up the Marriage Foundation think tank in May 2012 to champion the institution on a national basis and promote ‘healthy, stable relationships’.

The Office for Judicial Complaints, the body that polices the behaviour of judges, advised Sir Paul to take a lower profile after he protested about the devastating impact of family break-up on children, criticised cohabitation, and called for greater support for marriage.

But in December that year he gave an interview which appeared to criticise the government for focussing too much on the issue of gay marriage.

It attracted 10 complaints and an inquiry found his speeches and newspaper articles were ‘incompatible with his judicial responsibilities’.

 

 

Lord Thomas issued a warning say Sir Paul had brought the judiciary into disrepute with his views. When he complained that this was ‘unfair and disproportionate’, he received another reprimand.

He said: ‘I thought it was completely ridiculous.

 

'Every time I said anything, a member of the public wrote in and I found the whole enormous panoply of the judicial complaints organisation just grinding on. I mean, where do we go after a reprimand? Public hanging?’

 

Sir Paul, who has heard some of the UK’s highest-profile divorce cases, including that of Sir Paul McCartney and Heather Mills, said the senior judiciary was ‘risk averse to the point of being frightened of our own shadow.’

 

He said: ‘He [Lord Thomas] is the one who should have put a stop to it. He thinks I’m the one who brought the judiciary into disrepute. I’m not sure about that.

‘Allowing this to get out of hand has done us [the senior judiciary] no good at all. I think I said to him in a letter this whole affair brings the judiciary into disrepute.

'It makes us look stupid. It makes us look risk averse to the point of being ridiculous when half a dozen members of the public can provoke this kind of storm. It should not be allowed to happen.’

 

Sir Paul, 64, officially retired from the High Court’s family division last month but is continuing to sit as a judge while he finishes hearing three divorce cases.

He set up the Marriage Foundation to research the consequences of family breakdown on children, which he says is increased risk of indiscipline in schools, drug-taking, behavioural problems, gang violence, poor mental health, lack of achievement in exams and failure in the job market.

 

He said the ‘epidemic’ was damaging the lives of millions of children, with some 3.8million caught up in the family justice system.

He said: ‘I am not saying that every broken family produces dysfunctional children but almost every dysfunctional child is the product of a broken family.

 

‘Separation of parents may be good for the parents. It is never, never, never good for the children.’

The Judicial Conduct Investigations Office said: ‘The office plays an important role in maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. It is a statutory body through which the lord chancellor and lord chief justice investigate judges and magistrates under regulations passed by parliament.’

It’s the NATIONAL JUDICIAL INSTITUTE

Reply Count
2
last update
Monday, May 19, 2014
legal disclaimer
Audience
Public
Add new
---
Share this Page
Generate PDF file
Generate document You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel
Download PDF
Contact
Search Google about
Search bing.com about
Content feed
RSS content feed: You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel
Notified by email email notification on replies to this page: You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel click here and receive notification of this specific page
Add your Comment Reply add your comments to: You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel Reply to in a new window
Create a new page
2 replies

You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel

Lawyers | Fathers in action group Voice Audience: Public

You have been conspired against taken to the cleaners by a corrupt judiciary and the Canadian Judicial Counsel

Lawyers | Rick Voice Audience: Public

Jeremy


Access Brainsyntax

★★★ ★★★ Become a brainsyntax Member ★★★ ★★★

Access non public pages as Member
Introduce or record new content We are also assisting with content placement, subjects: Family Courts, Family Law Cases, Parental Alienation, Lawyers & Judges, Obstructions of Justice, Police, Courts, spiteful ex's, Hostile aggressive parenting, injustice, malice, obstruction, oppression and many other subjects ... Contact us

★★★ ★★★ Brainsyntax Members, Add new content, build the brainsyntax.com application ★★★ ★★★
Back || Home
X
Latest pages on brainsyntax.com: