Sault Ste Marie ON lawyer Boom Alyss audience: Authenticated Does anyone know any good children's lawyers in Sault Ste Marie ON? If so can i request...
The Thoughts of a alienated father in regards to Parental Alienation and indoctrination
Asking for his child voice -
Part II of the Ontario Break up by Vincent Schiele
The Law Society of Upper Canada attempted to muzzle members by directing them not to talk to the media in relation to a Star investigation that showed the self-governing body does not report crooked lawyers to police.
In emails sent to benchers, the name given to those who govern the ... access page ...
The Law Society of Upper Canada attempted to muzzle members by directing them not to talk to the media in relation to a Star investigation that showed the self-governing body does not report crooked lawyers to police.
In emails sent to benchers, the name given to those who govern the law society and sit in judgment of lawyers at disciplinary hearings, the organization’s CEO Rob Lapper said, “that if you are approached, I . . . urge you not to respond to reporters.”
Roy Thomas, a spokesperson for the law society, told the Star Friday that benchers are “free to express their personal views, as they regularly do.” “The CEO was reminding benchers that when there is a media request for a response on behalf of the law society, that our organization, like most organizations, has a protocol in place. The treasurer is the law society’s official spokesperson,” Thomas said.
“To the extent that the Star’s questions are about the organization’s discipline processes, the organization needs to provide consistent and fully informed responses, from the organization’s official spokesperson.”
The emails sent by Lapper followed questions the Star sent to the law society regarding how the self-governing organization for some 46,000 lawyers in Ontario disciplines those who engage in suspected criminal activity.
The Star’s investigation revealed that more than 230 lawyers were sanctioned by the law society in the last decade for criminal-like acts, such as theft and fraud. The Star found these lawyers stole, defrauded or diverted more than $60 million in client money held in trust. While most were reprimanded, suspended or disbarred by the profession’s regulator, only 41 faced criminal charges. Of these, only 12 went to jail.
Most staff at the court house do not want to fill our ex parte motions. It is very simple ..... motion form. Supporting affidavit as to why the children / child is in need of return. Remember the onius is on the society to prove they can NOT adequately support the fa...
Absolutely, but you will need an attorney to represent you. a good one. Someone who acts like an attorney and not one of those phony garbage cans showing up at court and ignoring CAS countless illegal actions (the entire process is FIXED) to steal your children.
David DeLugas has 31 years of experience in family law, business and commercial matters, and personal injury and wrongful death claims and actions in private practice and while associated with some of the most prestigious law firms
David DeLugas has 31 years of experience in family law, business and commercial matters, and personal injury and wrongful death claims and actions in private practice and while associated with some of the most prestigious law firms
He is also an advocate of the right of parents to raise their children as the parents determine without government interference except when necessary to protect children from harm. His clients have included as many mothers as fathers.
In business and commercial matters, he has represented businesses and individuals in their disputes, some that resulted in lawsuits being filed or being defended, most that resolved by settlement agreements, and many that have gone through trials before juries or before judges. When representing parties who have conflict, David has developed a pragmatic approach for his clients to avoid problems and to have their businesses and personal lives operate as smoothly as possible in a litigious world.
Whether you hire an attorney (and he can assist in your negotiating, that's right, negotiating the fee you would pay an attorney) or you first attempt to resolve your claims without an attorney which may "net" you more in a settlement, David will help you be realistic about your claims and teach you how to preserve evidence and to present and negotiate on your own.
A trial attorney knows how to battle, but, like a good warrior, knows that battles come at a price. As a highly experienced mediator, David can help you defuse a difficult situation and seek a resolution that is inexpensive to attain, expeditious without a long delay, and may preserve the personal and/or business relationship that otherwise would be destroyed in the legal battle, the alternative to a negotiated or mediated outcome.
What to expect from the Coach:
As the Coach, he will guide and educate you on how to set clear goals that benefit your child/children and you and how to make the best effort possible to attain those goals.
As the Coach, David will cut to the chase and assist you in personal and business matters to seek the best outcome possible by helping you make a valid, reasonable and honest risk vs. reward analysis.
In a no-nonsense manner, David is capable of helping you assess your situation, come up with the options available to you, decide on a course of action and seek the outcome you want, doing so in the most efficient and effective manner possible.
Education:
University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill (J.D.) 1981
Duke University (B.A.) 1976
Experienced Mediator and Arbitrator registered with the Georgia Office of Dispute Resolution (GODR) in the areas of Domestic Relations, Specialized Domestic Violence, and General Mediation and Arbitration.
Are you in business? Before entering into a Letter of Intent (LOI), be sure to consult with legal counsel and make sure your counsel is aware of Landan et. al. v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, et. al. (No. 2:12cv 926, W.D. Pa. Aug 5, 2012, where the court rule...
System was misguided, officials admit Thousands of children needlessly uprooted
YVES LAVIGNE. The Globe and Mail. Toronto, Ont: Nov 23, 1981 . pg. P.1
Neither can we stop this "Aren't we just the most honourable of all in our pretty black dresses" judgies "back p... access page ...
System was misguided, officials admit Thousands of children needlessly uprooted
YVES LAVIGNE. The Globe and Mail. Toronto, Ont: Nov 23, 1981 . pg. P.1
Neither can we stop this "Aren't we just the most honourable of all in our pretty black dresses" judgies "back patting Ceremony" from occurring but we sure as heck can make sure that it doesn't go off uncontested.
At the very very least we owe that to the children and families...and it isn't going to get any better unless we do.
At our first protest back in 2011 we kind of caught them off guard and we're able to get up close and personal with the judgies:
In regards to this just past 2012 Ceremony, the Metro Toronto police we're waiting for us, literally, when we arrived and they had these blanket no trespass orders...
(which we will be obtaining copies of via the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act=FIPPA)
...which kept most but not all of us hundreds of metres back from the Church's front doors:
Later on during the day while we were protesting in front of the downtown Toronto University Ave. courthouse itself, the senior Minister of that Church of the Holy Trinity came over to speak with us.
She claimed that they, meaning the Ministers themselves, had no idea that citizens were being denied entrance into the Church Ceremony AND that if they had known it was happening, they would have spoken out against it.
We'll be sure to provide her opportunities to advocate on our behalfs for the future events.
She also told us that they could hear our statements and claims, registered via bullhorns from hundreds of metres away out at the public sidewalk, inside the Church during the Ceremony.
One of our good friends got a great photograph of the three senior judgies exiting the Church and all of them were looking directly down to where we were ummm "expressing our concerns."
Mentally unstable eh? I just love how 'they' label people who succeed, and call them out on BS. This is still a tactic used today, it's disgusting and it needs to stop! Notice his name Kenneth J. Thompson, not John Thompson!
Mentally unstable eh? I just love how 'they' label people who succeed, and call them out on BS. This is still a tactic used today, it's disgusting and it needs to stop! Notice his name Kenneth J. Thompson, not John Thompson!
Family Law Reform Project Phase II conditional questionare best kept secret in NS The Department of Justice is working to improve and update the province’s family laws. Interested Nova Scotians are invited to review a discussion paper and give feedback on proposed changes to the Ma... access page ...
Family Law Reform Project Phase II conditional questionare best kept secret in NS The Department of Justice is working to improve and update the province’s family laws. Interested Nova Scotians are invited to review a discussion paper and give feedback on proposed changes to the Maintenance and Custody Act (MCA).
These changes will help families experiencing separation and custody issues by addressing specific challenges in family laws, updating them and making them clearer.
The Maintenance and Custody Act governs parenting arrangements including care, custody, and time spent with a child. The proposed changes to the Act would:
update the language used in the Act to describe both the job of parenting and the time that a child spends with parents and others;
provide new options setting up parenting arrangements for a child and for responding to identified ongoing challenges by:
adding the concept of a ‘parenting plan’ with a list of options that might be included in a parenting plan;
providing guidelines for when a parent or guardian wants to relocate with a child; and
listing ways to address failure to comply with an order for parenting time or contact time.
The discussion paper is available here. If responding by email, please save a copy of the paper on your computer before typing your responses. This will allow you to access the links without losing your information. To receive a hardcopy of the paper, or for additional questions, please send requests to:
Email: familylawfeedback@gov.ns.ca Phone: 902- 424-5341 Mail: Family Law Reform Project, Nova Scotia Department of Justice, 5151 Terminal Rd., P.O. Box 7, Halifax, B3J 2L6
Feedback is due, either electronically or in writing, by June 30, 2014.
I found this site on the gov website.
Best kept secret in NS. They want feedback for the Provincial Custody and Maintenance.
In regards to your reply as to contact information for ____ and _____ ___. While I thank you for you reply albeit somewhat delayed I take issue with much of it. My reason for this is as follows. I have been forced to plead guilty to charges against my lawyers wi... access page ...
In regards to your reply as to contact information for ____ and _____ ___. While I thank you for you reply albeit somewhat delayed I take issue with much of it. My reason for this is as follows. I have been forced to plead guilty to charges against my lawyers wishes (Mr. Gavin Jones) because the only way I could get John Howard Society to supervise my visits after I moved out of Bedford Place. The reasoning behind this was once i got sentenced to probation i could utilize their services. As well i am not exactly sure if 2 hours a month was what the judge had in mind when granting me supervised visits. if you check through the records you will find that through out the last year that is all the visiting time I received.
Because of this I tried to reason with your client on numerous occasions without threatening or violent behavior and have been charged with many other offences. As such I felt that leaving the province for the time being was in the best interest of myself. As for her feeling much safer i will reiterate once again she has never been threatened nor has their been a single violent or threatening overture made towards her or my children. I find this whole ordeal extremely distasteful as well as unlawfully discriminating.against myself. I have been clean from drugs as of April of 2013 and have no problem what so ever in providing drug sample as long as Miss Mcdonald does the same.
As for an address I am leaving Trout Creek Ontario as of the 1st of June and continuing east to Montreal. I will however be back in Kelowna the very day my probation orders and the peace bond has run it course which I believe is the 9th of January next year. As soon as I have an address where you can have me served with papers I will let you know but seeing as Miss Mcdonald has always known where i have been I find your request absolutely disgusting and insulting. She knows she can reach me through any number of friends that we both know and has also refused to pick up or have delivered items I left for my children. if she files for sole custody and or to have my parentals right taken away I will be on the first bus back to Kelowna to fight any such actions.
I would also like to suggest you do some research into parental alienation and all that it entails because I have been refused contact with my children since Febuary of this year not to mention all of the completely false accusations she has made against me which I can easily prove are false by bringing such witnesses as i mentioned in the earlier email forth. Now although I know exactly where my children are and their phone number. I have not made any attempt to contact them through either of those avenues and simply wish to know how to contact them legally and without causing them any more undue stress.
I would also like to point out that my children wish to see me as I have had this relayed to me by her own friends. Mr. Peterson my only wish at this time is to have contact with my children and if that is denied I will pursue all legal avenues available to me up to and including the reporting of her abusive behavior of my children. In short she has told nothing but lies which have done irreversible damage to myself and my children. Being a Lawyer I can understand you have or at least should have your clients best interest at heart but allowing her to continue to wreak havoc on my and my childrens life is only going to harm her eventually when the lies and parental alienation as well as child abuse comes to light.
So Mr. Peterson I welcome going back to court as I have spoken to many many of my and Miss McDonald closest friends and neighbors who almost to a person has agreed to come to court and testify to what is ACTUALLY the truth and put an end to this travesty. I would also like to add that as a family lawyer you must or at least should be aware what parental alienation is, what is does to the children and the spouse and how it is accomplished. I will also be examining a civil suit when this is over as it has caused myself and my children extreme physical and mental anguish.
- - - -
I cant stand that mouthpiece she has. Shoulda seen me on my first family court appearance they had to put a sheriff right behind me to keep me from jumping up and calling him a liar after i did just that about a half dozen times
Oh and what the hell is puffery? I thought i had a fairly good command of the English laungage but thats a new one to me.
Not to mention the criminal behavior he is talking about has al been breaches i received while trying to get the kids Mother to let me see them more than 2 hours a month. 17 breaches i was charged with in last year but only convicted of 5 which i pled to to purposely get probation so that John Howard society would supervise my visits has she turned down the first half a dozen persons i put forth as supervisors. Child welfare refused because it is not a matter they are dealing with and my only option was John Howard society or pay 25 bucks an hour for a private supervisor which i could not afford. it is simply the most ridiculous thing i have ever had the misfortune to be subjected to. I also provided them with clean drug tests so whatever "Puffery" is I think it is himself and my Ex who is guilty of that.
As a member of the bar i believe it should be your duty to check into what I have told you and take the appropriate action.
Thank you for your reply and I welcome and further replies. But please in the future just ask Miss Mcdonald who she or yourself can contact in Kelowna to find out where I am and how to get ahold of me if you do not wish to use this email address as she is and always will be fully aware of where I am and what I am doing as I make no secret of it and make many many posts on facebook as to my whereabouts and what I am doing. We both have mutual friends and all she needs do is ask them or ask them to have me go pick up papers should it be necessary. But of course she already knows this and is only playing games as im sure you well know.
So my kids mothers laywer says he gonna serve me papers to take me to court and take away all my parental rights including a no contact order against my kids. WTF I have not even been in kelowna for 2 months. That happens ill be back in Ktown in 3 days and ill be ser...
This is Family Law Reform! Let's team up for positive change in all aspects! Every government agency and law is a part of the family law reform movement which means we are all on the same team. Let's join forces at the...
This is Family Law Reform! Let's team up for positive change in all aspects! Every government agency and law is a part of the family law reform movement which means we are all on the same team. Let's join forces at the...
Nadia Komeniche: Are you dreaming or smoking something? How can you RE FORM a criminal enterprise? Get out of the Matrix for God's sake! Its like putting a bandaid on a gangrene hoping it will stop the rotting of the flesh. Delete the elite and start over with www.nationalliberyalliance.org Sign up to be a jurist in your county so you can RE PLACE the dead Bar Association Vatican cults with courts of pre-1789! Stop the madness, please! Wake up.
Brandon Lyons I'm neither, what I am is a advocate of justice and you will see me make changes along with other advocates because we are relentless in our efforts. All I wanna know is who's coming with me
Ray R. Lautenschlager While your call is heard many will not step up to the plate to do anything because they will not take the time to do the research necessary to bring about any reforms. Understand that I have written and gotten introduced 4 equal custody bills in Ohio over the past 8 years. The last version would have completed ended the problems associated with custody cases in divorce and never married while effecting changes that are necessary in child support. Why didn’t it pass? It was blocked by National Parents Organization aka Fathers and Families.
As to child support reform, many do not know where the root problem is with that system and only scream that the states are making money off it which is why support payments are so “high”. Just one of the myths that keeps getting put out there.
Reality is the tables are wrong for every state except one because they were done by regions, not state specific. I have teams in various states that I am working with already on reform in custody, child support and in CPS issues. It takes work and I mean work not talk or posting pictures.
Ohio Family Rights The truth about Fathers and Families National Parents Organization
Ohio Family Rights is devoted to ensuring the right of every child to a full relationship with both parents and the right of both parents to be real parents to their children and works to advocate new legislation to promote this. We work in numerous states well beyond the borders of Ohio and are onl…
Brandon Lyons Yes you're correct Ray R. Lautenschlager but its important for up to have an all the above strategy for family and by reaching out for public support we will inability find the advocates that are willing to do the research along with supporter advocates. This is a good strategy because when bill are introduced we can apply pressure to our elected officials with our strength in numbers. I'm looking forward to working with you and over advocates to get this done!
Ray R. Lautenschlager Name your state.
Brandon Lyons Washington
Ray R. Lautenschlager I have worked with Pam Roach, thru channels, on some issues there in the past in regards to custody in divorce. If you truly want to work on the divorce custody laws, then you need to start with the research as I have said. I work in other areas but that is my specialty. I have others that I am working with on CPS reform and we came close on a couple bills this year. Child support is an animal in itself. The review process, as mandated by federal law, took place last year. Ohio has been shut down on a lone issue that I raised and will likely not see a bill during our current session. They are out of time in this election year.
Nadia Komeniche Dudes, dont waste your time, dont hold your breaths. Partial reforms "curing" ANYTHING at all, is ONLY illusion. This system is based on money making by selling babies and charging taxes. Until and unless you stop either, you are dummed. Stop US tax payer from paying taxes. Stop HHS sending billions of tax money to case rigging Bar Association monsters. Stop ...
Brandon Lyons Nadia Komeniche hopefully by watching our actions we can inpire hope for you. We're keep on fighting!
Nadia Komeniche You are fighting a losing battle. This shows me you dont know the beast you are fighting. It is barried in Vatican and other satanic cults. It is NOT going to change until and unless you yank those criminals off of their benches and lock em up. Period. A new court of people and grand juries is being constituted as we speak. If you wanna make a swat of a difference, join natiinal liberty alliance as a jurist. Othrwise you are just brainwashed yourself or feeding koolaids to everyone else. Get real Brandon Lyons, we got no more kids to lose to child trafficking maphia.
Brandon Lyons Well Nadia nothing left to do but to prove you wrong and then celebrate together when the long battle is over. I'm not saying its going to be easy because its going to be hard. What I am saying is im going to do it. Cheers
What that law states: Criminally negligent homicide is the causing of the death of another Men and Women with no intention to kill or cause serious injury.
Penalty conditions
4-6 a) if owing to the failure to render aid to a sick man or woman without valid reasons, by a man o... access page ...
What that law states: Criminally negligent homicide is the causing of the death of another Men and Women with no intention to kill or cause serious injury.
Penalty conditions
4-6 a) if owing to the failure to render aid to a sick man or woman without valid reasons, by a man or woman who is duty-bound to render it
“Suicide Experts in the field suggest that a suicidal person is feeling so much pain that they can see no other option. They feel that they are a burden to others, and in desperation see death as a way to escape their overwhelming pain and anguish. The suicidal state of mind has been described as constricted, filled with a sense of self-hatred, rejection, and hopelessness.”
So in the case of family law, a sickness brought on by:
If those within the family law system impose hardships of financial ruin, loss of family in the form of parental alienation and any other undue hardships. If they are aware that they are causing it and refuse to render aid in the form of more moral decisions, they could be considered as committing criminally negligent homicide if it causes the person to commit suicide.
So a sickness brought on by the family law system where they fail to render aid.
That would make this a level 5 crime
Now I know this is a bit of a stretch to be able to prove it as true, but given that divorce/suicide statistics have been kept by stats canada and that they go so far ast to combine the statistics on a chart, it's not like they are totally unaware of the situation.
If even one case was brought forward though...........
This may be a route that should be explored.
Divorce a death sentence?
It shouldn't be and I doubt that the judges and lawyers give it much thought, but there is a very disturbing connection between the two.
The connection is enough that statistics canada has a chart based on it. (scroll down to chart 8)
“During the 1950s, divorce and suicide rates were fairly stable, but both began to rise during the 1960s. In 1968, Parliament passed the Divorce Act which established a federal-level divorce law. In the following year the divorce rate increased by 128%, and as Chart 8 shows, suicide rates moved in the same direction. In 1986 the Divorce Act was amended, reducing waiting times from three years of separation to one. This resulted in 1987 having the highest rate of divorce in Canadian history. This increase in divorces was paralleled by an increase in suicide rates. After the 1987 spike in the divorce rate, both divorce and suicide rates have seen a similar decline.”
Coincidence? Or another sign that the family law system is in dire need of repair?
Mike Clattenburg: Even though divorce and suicide is a choice by the person and/or persons involved, choices are influenced by factors. It seems a lot of these suicides related to divorce is caused by mostly men feeling like there in the position that they cannot live afterwards due to their financial standing after feeling the wrath of a biased judge handing down a ruling that 90% of the time favors heavily in a woman's favor.
This might be a loaded point of view, but why are the judges decisions still set in years ago train of thought where a woman needs supporting when many women of today claim equal rights? If men and woman are in today's perception perceived as the same, then why aren't they looked at in the same way as far as the courts are concerned?
I've put my faith in the system for 5 years. Today, Justice Moore rewrote the law without hearing submissions on the issues being appealed. I have lost all hope in the Family Law Justice system. Is there anyone else with the same horror stories from the OCJ at 47 sheppard in Toronto? Is there any... access page ...
I've put my faith in the system for 5 years. Today, Justice Moore rewrote the law without hearing submissions on the issues being appealed. I have lost all hope in the Family Law Justice system. Is there anyone else with the same horror stories from the OCJ at 47 sheppard in Toronto? Is there anyone willing to help fight for judicial accountability?
Ali Soerensen I would but the judge is no longer at the OCJ exactly for making outrageous orders and abusive comments. He is in criminal law. I doubt he was sanctioned for any misconduct. I don't know why he is no longer a family law judge at the OCJ and the judicial administration is very secretive on the issue
Matt & Nadine O'Connor from Fathers4Justice mark the 12th anniversary of the campaign with George Galloway MP on his Sputnik show which is broadcast around the world on Russia Today.
200 children lose contact with their fathers in secret courts in the UK e... access page ...
Matt & Nadine O'Connor from Fathers4Justice mark the 12th anniversary of the campaign with George Galloway MP on his Sputnik show which is broadcast around the world on Russia Today.
200 children lose contact with their fathers in secret courts in the UK every day; 1 in 3 children live without their father; family breakdown is costing the country around £44 billion a year. This week Matt and Nadine O’Connor, founders of Fathers for Justice 12 years ago this month, come into the studio to discuss these startling statistics and take a look at a justice system which appears to be failing families.
Note, after the main interview they revisit the issue and some twitter comments about fatherlessness later in the programme.
Introduce or record new content We are also assisting with content placement, subjects: Family Courts, Family Law Cases, Parental Alienation, Lawyers & Judges, Obstructions of Justice, Police, Courts, spiteful ex's, Hostile aggressive parenting, injustice, malice, obstruction, oppression and many other subjects ... Contact us
★★★ ★★★ Brainsyntax Members, Add new content, build the brainsyntax.com application ★★★ ★★★
Actually, they are two bodies. The CJC is supposed to be the disciplinary and standards setting body for federally appointed judges. I have issued a couple of complaints through them. The National Judicial Institute is supposedly setting policy and training for all judges, despite being effective... access page ...
Actually, they are two bodies. The CJC is supposed to be the disciplinary and standards setting body for federally appointed judges. I have issued a couple of complaints through them. The National Judicial Institute is supposedly setting policy and training for all judges, despite being effectively a branch of the Department of Justice (on their phone system, computer servers, but all still hotly deny). Both are headed up by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
The Canadian Judicial Council is a federal body created under the Judges Act with the mandate to promote efficiency, uniformity, and accountability, and to improve the quality of judicial service in the superior courts of Canada. ( just had to make that Pink)
The Council is also mandated to review any complaint or allegation against a superior court judge.
They are a joke nothing more nothing less.
I believe the National Judicial Counsel is more involved in the training the judges receive and are indoctrinated with,( of course Feminism is a doctrine following the same principals as feminism which is also a doctrine) I may be wrong but I sure as hell know,
That a pile of shit is a pile of shit, I don't care what colour you portray or spray it, it still stinks, and that smell has permeated the nostrils of to many fathers in Canada.
The crap The Canadian judges dish out sticks like shit to a blanket, the smell of which sticks with for the rest of your life, no matter hard you may to scrub it off.
Can't wait for my day in court, with Richard Marceau and Laurie Smith,
Your Client is a pathologic liar, she lied to authorities and manipulate services and lied to you her legal representation, multiple times, as you know yourself anything what she said to you in regards to this case was proven false in all our prev... access page ...
In reply to the letter sent April 18/2012
Your Client is a pathologic liar, she lied to authorities and manipulate services and lied to you her legal representation, multiple times, as you know yourself anything what she said to you in regards to this case was proven false in all our previous court conferences.
In regards that _______ has been confronted with any court matters is a lie. I have 24 hours of High definition video with audio to proof the difference and also ______ is at any time surrounded by witnesses and on film so your client will not be successful with these lies.
In regards that your client has been posted on the internet by myself is not true. Your client is responsible for the defamation of my character during the last three years to anybody who would listen to her. She has stated that I am an abuser towards her and my daughter, this will be presented to the court and I recommend the same for your client if she feels I am disparaging her in any manner.
______ my family and I are not sure of ______ full legal name, I have a video recording of my daughter very aggressively stating that her name is "_____" This was very strange to all the observers and witnesses because ______ was born _____ _____ Schiele as her birth certificate proves. It is very intolerable for a four year old child to be confronted with adult subjects to the point she has been taught specific replies to the questions she may encounter and she does not recognize her birth Surname "Schiele".
Your client has clearly shown again negligent parental behavior towards _______ by not putting _______s love and natural bond with her father first.
makes the best money for the firm , the client who lies ... exposer...
Audience: Authenticated re the lawyer & the liars Invalid access privileges authenticate to see this reply ...
Anyone with more information about this above narcissistic person, please come forward, use the contact form, Specially researching her time in Montreal where she drooped out of University because of a alleged rape, her sister did not believe it happened and mentione...
I battled for 3 years in the family court for the right to raise my own daughter and rescue her from a life of abuse and neglect and eventually won sole custody. I also spent the next 10 years repairing the damage done and taking her from bottom in the school and the Special Needs class at 8 yo t... access page ...
I battled for 3 years in the family court for the right to raise my own daughter and rescue her from a life of abuse and neglect and eventually won sole custody. I also spent the next 10 years repairing the damage done and taking her from bottom in the school and the Special Needs class at 8 yo to a 1st class honours degree in Psychology and the university medal when she was still only 21 yo. Now at 23 she is in the second year of her PHD. I found NOTHING fair about the system though.
I had to fight everyone including the social workers, the psychologists/report writers, the police, the crisis care workers and the so called family court. It all but destroyed me but I would do it all again for the sake of my child. In the acknowledgements at the start of her honours thesis after thanking her tutors and fellow students my daughter wrote the following :- Finally thank you to my dad for fighting for me, guiding me through life and always believing in me. I could not have reached this point without the sacrifices you made. Made me a very proud dad yet if the so called family law system had, had its way it would never have been.
Despite a mountain of evidence of abuse and neglect, in the end the only reason I gained custody was after my brave little 7/8 yo daughter voted with her feet, shoved down their throats what I had been telling them for 3 years and ultimately SHAMED the bastards into doing something.
It is indeed a sad indightment on our so called family law system that it had to come to that before my daughter and I received any semblance of justice.
Sad that protective fathers and protective mothers are treated so differently both by family law AND society at large. You might be surprised at the number of children who are being abused and neglected in our society and who, Hey just sometimes, might be better off with a caring father. In the majority of cases a child, particularly a daughter, is better off with the mother , but what do you do when your child is being abused and neglected ???. So often children are removed into foster care instead of being placed with an at least halfway decent father. I should know. When I went to collect my daughter after the court hearing,i demanded that the social worker accompany me.
All she got for her troubles was a mouthful of abuse, despite the fact that they had supported her for 3 years. I distinctly remember the social worker saying that "if she doesn't go with her father she will be be placed in foster care, but that she would certainly NOT be staying where she was. It really was that close for my daughter and I but it seems not such an uncommon occurrence for fathers involved in protecting their children.
If the court appoints a lawyer for my children, so they get to speak, and it is unbiased,,, is it ethical that the lawyer is meeting with my Ex husband, and NOT with my son???
The office of the Children's Lawyer upon appointment should set up an appointment with both parents pr... access page ...
If the court appoints a lawyer for my children, so they get to speak, and it is unbiased,,, is it ethical that the lawyer is meeting with my Ex husband, and NOT with my son???
The office of the Children's Lawyer upon appointment should set up an appointment with both parents prior to meeting with the child. They also will have you fill out an I depth questionnaire to better understand the issues and concerns of both parties. Following that, they will meet with the child at their office, and sometimes at school. They may also request releases of information to speak to other relevant parties.
They will meet with both. I am in the middle of this now. Everyone involved will be spoke with for all information.
the lawyer never met with me. he met with my ex, and not my son. then told the court that my son wanted to live with the ex... doesn't quite seem right , when the lawyer is supposed to be my sons voice, not another voice for my ex
That is very, very strange. If you are not the custodial parent perhaps they do not have to meet with you, I am not certain, but you should have been mailed a very detailed package detailing the process and including forms requiring your attention.
the cfs lawyer admitted that my son was begging the worker to come home but thiis lawyer lied and said he didn't want to see me without protection. this was coming from my ex, not my son!
and as far as stuff in writing,,, cfs has refused since day one to put anything in writing. in a year and a half I have never gotten one piece of paper from CFS
I have had custody for the last 12 years,, till the Ex found a young, dumb worker to fall for his crap.. The Judge had previously warned him to stop harassing me and making false claims to CFS,, yet he managed to pull it off.. The worker was a friend of his,, go figure. He couldnt win in court for the last 10 years..
Huge problems with ocl. There is no oversight on them. Told my husband the courts are biased to woman. My husbands daughters mother has three assault convictions, excessive alcoholic, convicted of fraud. They told him she has the right to see a 13 year old unsupervised. Never even bothered to interview her step mother.....me. We are looking for recourse....suggestions?
the role of a children's lawyer is to convey only the wishes and preferences to the court for a child who is mature enough to speak up for themselves. The lawyer has no obligation to meet with the parents at all. The child is the client of the...See More
That is what I thought. Is there anywhere can I file a report against the lawyer? And is there any where to file a complaint about the judge for not allowing the child to speak?
Report the misconduct, conflict of interest relating to lawyers and licensed paralegals
If you feel that your lawyer did not do their job properly or behaved unprofessionally, you can make a complaint to the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC) MessageDetail/626
Record your conversations with the cfs worker, and others relevant to this matter, at All times. Then you will have proof that the cfs worker acknowledged your sons' wishes/preferences. Would like to double check the section of the Criminal Code - isn't is 183.1 advocates? Right to audio record
Is it the law review society or something? If they can be proven to have done their job in ignorance of the rules they can have their licence to practice pulled. With CAS lawyers, since CAS is their client they can't be disbarred, but this lawyer who acted against your child, can. And I disagree with the courts being biased against "women". The courts are just biased to a white hetero normative judgement. The farther you are from being a white person with lots of money, well spoken, and of a clean-cut attractive appearance, the more likely they will rule against you, no matter what your gender. I've been in court many times (as a spectator) and that seems to be the way it goes.
they pick on people who financially can't defend themselves. single parents seem to be their favorite target
Kids never really get theirsay, if they did, the kids with be with the parent they want to be with. Time to stop hurting our children.
full stop, I just read your other messages. First of all, submit your evidence directly to the court. Get a new lawyer, or just fire the one you have. No lawyer is better than one who refuses to enter evidence that will help your case. Bottom line. Your lawyer works for YOU not CAS.
Ugh, that no lawyer sentence was so confusing. I meant it would be better not to have a lawyer, than have that one. And no, they don't care if you're a single parent. My husband and I were hapilly married, educated, employed and making good money when they first showed up at our door. Based on an obviously false claim from a woman who was mad at my husband for refusing to sleep with her, they destroyed my marriage, lost me my job, and traumatized my children. CAS doesn't care who you are. I have a friend working at a high level of government and they've even been at her door. They're like the S.S. That's what you create when you make legislation that gives a private corporation thrme power to do whatever they want without recourse.
Since the system is corrupt, a lawyer selected by the "system" will NOT necessarily reflect the voice of the child, but the voice of the system. This is indeed a conflict of interest and collusion.
You need to get access to the child and have their true wishes independently recorded. Sometimes a psychologist selected by the parents that can submit an expert report that includes observations various parties are trying to put words in the child's mouth.
One child I worked with who was wanting to return home, was booted out of a courtroom at age 11, the judge ruling it was not in the child's best interest to hear the proceedings, yet the rest of the public could stay.
Next, over the course of a year social workers and foster parents "worked" on the child, meaning bribes, promises of a nice holiday in Disneyland, cash, shopping, friends visits, you name it.
Once they got the child to agree to stay in care, THEN a lawyer was assigned. This was a specialist that ensures parents cannot refute their child's "wishes". The child was further pronounced PTSD, another Supreme Court justice used that as a further basis to prevent in-court testimony. The magnitude of manipulation at all levels to ensure the state has the advantage and the true voice of the child simply cannot be understated.
Later, with the help of another advocate, and the incredible luck of unsupervised access, the child understood what was going on and decided to instruct the lawyer to say to the court the wish was to return home. The child "protectors" withdrew. The child went home. End of story.
Wherever this event originally occurred the local media (every single outlet) need to have the story placed in their laps.
My ex has a history of childhood abuse. She appears to have transferred her hate for her abuser on to me. She fights excessively to limit my son's time with me. We... access page ...
Wherever this event originally occurred the local media (every single outlet) need to have the story placed in their laps.
My ex has a history of childhood abuse. She appears to have transferred her hate for her abuser on to me. She fights excessively to limit my son's time with me. We've been in the "family court" system for over 5 years. We are progressing toward 50/50. I am amazed at how easily a psychologist and psychiatrist have bought into to her false story. Even when it unravels they still side with motherhood over fatherhood.
The Best Interest of the Child model allows judges way too much latitude in decision making and that's what keeps me up at night.
I'm writing you regarding Bill C-560 relating to making progressive reforms to the Divorce Act. I am aware that opponents of this bill brand it as not being child focused, and in turn support the current system because it presumably is child focused. This is a false argument. All of the sta... access page ...
I'm writing you regarding Bill C-560 relating to making progressive reforms to the Divorce Act. I am aware that opponents of this bill brand it as not being child focused, and in turn support the current system because it presumably is child focused. This is a false argument. All of the statistical evidence demonstrates the subpar outcomes for children from sole custody setting. In addition, under the current system, children don’t hire lawyers – it is parents that hire lawyers to maximize their own outcomes. The current system is not child focused.
The reality is that Bill C-560 offers a system that is much more child focused than the current system. The proposed legislation still provides judges with full discretion, but changes the starting point from an effective presumption of a sole custody arrangement (which is the current outcome in about 80% of cases), to a presumption that a shared parenting arrangement is typically in a child’s best interest. This is supported by research that overwhelmingly indicates that children do better when both parents are actively involved in their lives. It will also vastly reduce bitter court battles which research shows is extremely harmful to children.
There are a lot of myths relating to the current family law system and proposed legislation. Attached to this correspondence is factual information that illustrates why Bill C-560 should be supported.
Given the trend in many other countries to move toward shared parenting as the preferred parenting model, it is clear that those that oppose shared parenting reforms will find themselves on the wrong side of history. Shouldn’t society celebrate when both parents want to be involved in their own children’s lives?
FACT – The current system results in very poor outcomes for children and their families - 90% of homeless and runaway children are from single parent homes. [US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census] - 71% of pregnant teenagers come from single parent homes. [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services press release, Friday, March 26, 1999] - 63% of youth suicides are from single parent homes. [US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census] - 85% of children who exhibit behavioral disorders come from single parent homes. [Center for Disease Control] - 71% of high school dropouts come from single parent homes. [National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools] - 75% of adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from single parent homes. [Rainbows f for all God’s Children] - 70% of juveniles in state operated institutions come from single parent homes. [US Department of Justice, Special Report, Sept. 1988] - 85% of youths in prisons grew up in a single parent homes. [Fulton County Georgia jail populations, Texas Department of Corrections, 1992] - Single parent boys and girls are: twice as likely to drop out of high school; twice as likely to end up in jail; and four times more likely to need help for emotional or behavioral problems. [US D.H.H.S. news release, March 26, 1999]
FACT – Outcomes for children are enhanced by shared parenting – “Children tend to do best after separation and divorce when both parents remain involved in their lives. Mothers and fathers are important to children for emotional support, protection, guidance, gender identity and their basic trust and confidence in themselves and in the world. Each parent plays a valuable role in child rearing.” – Public Health Agency of Canada
“In an analysis of 33 studies, children were better off psychologically, academically and socially when their parents had shared legal custody or shared physical custody, even though the shared custody was sometimes ordered against the mother’s wishes. Likewise in the Stanford study with 1100 parents, nearly one third of the mothers whose children were living in dual residence wanted sole physical custody. Despite this, their children were better off on all measures of depression, deviance and school performance.” (Dr. L. Nielsen, Shared Parenting: A Review of the Supporting Research)
FACT – This bill is wholly aligned to the 1998 federal Joint House-Senate Committee report entitled “For the Sake of the Children” – This report proposed a more prescriptive approach including a shared parenting presumption. The report advocated for reforms to reduce conflict and maintain and foster relationships with both parents and extended family members. The recommendations from this report have yet to be addressed.
FACT –The Supreme Court has identified material concerns with the current family law system – A 2013 Supreme Court report called for a “complete overhaul” of the family law system “from the ground up”, with a focus on ending a fixation on combat. The report goes on to say that estranged spouses and their children are seriously damaged by the current adversarial system.
FACT – The current family law system in NOT ALIGNED with the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child
“Both parents share responsibility for bringing up their children, and should always consider what is best for each child. Governments must respect the responsibility of parents for providing appropriate guidance to their children – the Convention does not take responsibility for children away from their parents and give more authority to governments. It places a responsibility on governments to provide support services.” – Article 18, UN Convention of the Rights of the Child
“The Convention does not take responsibility for children away from their parents and give more authority to governments. It does place on governments the responsibility to protect and assist families in fulfilling their essential role as nurtures of children.” – Article 5, UN Convention of the Rights of the Child
FACT – The Conservative Party has committed to progressive reforms to the Divorce Act – Conservative policy specifically states: “A Conservative Government will make the necessary changes to the Divorce Act to ensure that in the event of a marital breakdown, the Divorce Act will allow both parents and all grandparents to maintain a meaningful relationship with their children and grandchildren, unless it is clearly demonstrated not to be in the best interests of the children”. To date, the Conservative Party has not made any reforms.
FACT – Canada is lagging as many other countries are introducing shared parenting reforms – Countries around the developed world are introducing progressive reforms to their family law systems. Britain is the latest country to legislate such reforms. Britain now has a “presumption that a child’s welfare is likely to be furthered through safe involvement with both parents”. Consequently, in the absence of abuse, shared parenting has become the default. In this regard, Britain’s children’s minister Tim Loughton said that “we need to clarify and restore public confidence that the courts fully recognize the joint nature of parenting. We want the law to be far more explicit about the importance of children having an ongoing relationship with both parents after separation, where that is safe and in the child’s best interests. Where parents are able and willing to play a positive role in their child’s care they should have the chance to do so”. He went on to say that “this is categorically not about giving parents equal right to time with their children – it is about reinforcing society’s expectation that mothers and fathers should be jointly responsible for their children’s upbringing”.
FACT – Equal shared parenting legislation is very popular among Canadians – Based on polling conducted in 2007 (SES) and again in 2009 (Nanos), regardless of region, gender, age or political affiliation, about 80% of all cross-sections of Canadians support a presumption of equal shared parenting (with women supporting it slightly more than men).
FACT – An equal shared parenting presumption is what children want – Currently, approximately 90% of children from separated parents end up with what amounts to be a sole custody arrangement. This is despite the wishes of children of divorce. In one of the largest studies conducted by Arizona State University of 900 students of divorced families, 70% supported shared parenting arrangements, and 93% of which support shared parenting arrangements who are/were raised in such homes (W. Fabricius and L. Luecken, Journal of Family Psychology, 21). Children’s voices are not heard in the courts, and their wishes are not reflected in decisions.
FACT – Ordering shared parenting will not generate more conflict – In an American study of 598 shared parenting families, mothers who were forced into shared parenting arrangements three years later did not view it as detrimental to them or their children. Nearly 85% of these parents described their relationship as either friendly or neutral and businesslike. Even in cases where there were parenting disagreements, shared parenting was still viewed as effective (M. Melli and P. Brown, International Journal of Law, Policy and Family, 22).
FACT – The current litigious family law system generates conflict that is harmful to children – Much of the existing conflict between separating parents is directly attributable to the current litigious family law system. “None will suggest that resorting to the courts to settle issues of custody and visitation is good for the children involved… What little civility is left between parents before walking into court is almost destroyed by their posturing in the litigation.” (Justice Harvey Brownstone, Tug of War)
FACT – Young children need both parents – In a review of 33 studies published between 1982 and 1999, the young children whose parents had a shared parenting arrangement, were better off than the children living only with their mothers. Even in cases with conflict, the shared parenting children were doing better academically, emotionally, psychologically and socially. (R. Bauserman, Journal of Family Psychology)
FACT – Binding parenting decisions that are presumably in “the best interests of children” are currently made based on very limited information – Judges currently make temporary orders “on the basis of incomplete, subjective, and highly emotional written evidence with virtually no time to get to know the parents and no opportunity to meet the child whose life is being so profoundly affected… [these temporary orders] can be hard to disrupt by the time the parties are ready for trial. For this reason, orders obtained on motions can have a huge and often determinative impact on the final result in the case.” (Justice Harvey Brownstone, Tug of War)
I look forward to hearing back from you in this regard.
Sincerely, Mr. Ryan Glass
Source: Reader Participation link http://www.advocacycanada.com/Home/AdvocacyCanadaCampaignDetails/16
Introduce or record new content We are also assisting with content placement, subjects: Family Courts, Family Law Cases, Parental Alienation, Lawyers & Judges, Obstructions of Justice, Police, Courts, spiteful ex's, Hostile aggressive parenting, injustice, malice, obstruction, oppression and many other subjects ... Contact us
★★★ ★★★ Brainsyntax Members, Add new content, build the brainsyntax.com application ★★★ ★★★
Update to our story about SRLs at the SCC (below). Another SRL has drawn to our attention the fact that a SRL named Elizabeth Bernard presented her case before the Supreme Court of Canada just earlier this month (the decision is not yet out) (Bernard v AG). Elizabeth's presentation can be viewed ... access page ...
Update to our story about SRLs at the SCC (below). Another SRL has drawn to our attention the fact that a SRL named Elizabeth Bernard presented her case before the Supreme Court of Canada just earlier this month (the decision is not yet out) (Bernard v AG). Elizabeth's presentation can be viewed on this webcast - it is awesome. http://scc-csc-gc.insinc.com/en/clip.php?url=c/486/1971/201311040500wv450en,001Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Source: ~Jim Canie Canadians For Family Law Reform
Ontario Family Law Case Answer to Application from Alienated Father Two children missing their Papa
: Follow-up by: Chad Kibermanis
